As a result of a conversation I recently had with an Assemblyman, I’ve decided to clarify my view on Asset Forfeiture. When a person is arrested on drug charges, or whatever other charges trigger these things, I don’t mind if the assets are ‘frozen’ or held in a sort of escrow pending the results of the trial. We do the same with people; we hold them in jail awaiting trial unless a suitable bail is posted. But when the person is found innocent, all the frozen assets revert back to him. The point is that the holding of the assets should remain under the criminal law, with all the civil rights pertaining thereto; it should not be a separate case under civil law, where our Constitutional civil rights, as I have pointed out, are not as strong.
Politics
More Posts
A Complaint About Names: Two Rivers and a Road
Three things in Orange County that I think need more logical and useful names. One main primary river flows through the middle of the Woodbridge district of Irvine, thence through the San Joaquin Marshes, separating the University of California-Irvine side […]
On Baptists: Some Thoughts
Even though I am not a Baptist, Baptists remind us that we must all claim Jesus Christ for ourselves. But the tendency to base salvation on one’s ‘conversion experience’ has its limits. It focuses on one’s past life, rather than […]
If You Don’t Like Evangelicals, Don’t Blame the South
The South may be the one part of the country where ‘evangelicals’ actually have some cultural dominance. But ‘evangelicalism’ has had its power centers all around the country. This is especially so in the Philadelphia-Princeton belt, the halo around Lake […]